Goes to show that most people don't understand what is “right under their nose” unless they are educated and there's nothing more important than the quality of our basic-grade-school education system (which hasn't been great across the West for a couple generations). Anyone graduating from grade/high school should recognize that object as probably Ancient Roman and report it to the authorities.
While I agree, certain countries have not been so kind to folks who are sitting on archaeologically “rich” land. For instance, if that land belongs to a farmer who actively uses it to make a living, the government would buy it for pennies and the farmer would forever lose the land that put food on their tables and a roof over their heads. So, when they dig up a statue or others artifacts/structures, they immediately dispose of it. It is extremely unfortunate because we are losing so much history in the process.
Valid point and sounds like laws related to this matter should be improved. I've always said that the “rule of two” should apply to any government expropriation; i.e., twice market value. Regardless, the government should not have the right to expropriate land because someone dug up an artifact on their land; that attitude alone would save artifacts.
As a Greek, I could say the same thing about how ancient objects or structures have been misused or misunderstood in more modern times but I wouldn’t be embarrassed. Not everyone has an appreciation for the old as you and I or many others.
Goes to show that most people don't understand what is “right under their nose” unless they are educated and there's nothing more important than the quality of our basic-grade-school education system (which hasn't been great across the West for a couple generations). Anyone graduating from grade/high school should recognize that object as probably Ancient Roman and report it to the authorities.
While I agree, certain countries have not been so kind to folks who are sitting on archaeologically “rich” land. For instance, if that land belongs to a farmer who actively uses it to make a living, the government would buy it for pennies and the farmer would forever lose the land that put food on their tables and a roof over their heads. So, when they dig up a statue or others artifacts/structures, they immediately dispose of it. It is extremely unfortunate because we are losing so much history in the process.
Valid point and sounds like laws related to this matter should be improved. I've always said that the “rule of two” should apply to any government expropriation; i.e., twice market value. Regardless, the government should not have the right to expropriate land because someone dug up an artifact on their land; that attitude alone would save artifacts.
This story is very embarrassing for me as a Bulgarian.
As a Greek, I could say the same thing about how ancient objects or structures have been misused or misunderstood in more modern times but I wouldn’t be embarrassed. Not everyone has an appreciation for the old as you and I or many others.